Saturday, December 17, 2011

Question: Some of officials conferred power by legislation to act for justice, but knowingly to act injustly?

Based on I am unrepresented and experience some issues dealt with by some of officials [Government offcials %26amp; others] confered the power by Legislation, Acts %26amp; etc to act for interst of justice, but some of them knowingly to act for social realtionship, seriously prejudiced ethnic %26amp; etc.


Aforesaid facts is not making denigrating remake as to others, I am able to produce evidence who might query.


Some of facts express that some officials [conferred top power] deliberately to act for social relationship. Some officials are further responsable for the kind of issues being dealt with justly, but knowingly ignore them or alleged that they have no responsibility to deal with the issues.


In short, here legal system, unrepresented applicants are never to have their cases being dealt with justly, with respect of unrepresented case the officials act based on relationship with officials, friendship, prejudiced ethnic %26amp; according to no Legisaltion %26amp; Acts at all.|||Okay. Your attempt at speaking English is admirable, but you need to practice more.





Your question was really hard to understand, but basically, I think you are asking about personal bias influencing governmental positions, particularly in the Judiciary (?). If that is the case, I also disagree with the Judiciary branch of our federal government being appointed and not elected. It is not representative of the will of the people, and is, in my opinion, the constitution's only flaw. As for personal bias in government, the sad truth is that we are all human, and no matter how many anti-corruption measures we take, there will always be biased officials. It is human nature to be biased, and there is nothing we can change about that.


The system is imperfect, but it is the closest to perfect anyone has ever come, and I am happy with that.|||Question of “Whoever is liable to act for justice ....”.reveals how High Court dealt with my case as playing games %26amp; Philip Roddock was advised ...but turns his eyes into blind .... Alternatively another answer is better than this one given based on having no justice mind.

Report Abuse


|||The question is hard to understand, pls don't answer it. Pls make comments for interest of justice, no just for point of itself "The system is not perfect" is protecting moral turpitude from being revealed. Pls be advised the issue of this question is "knowingly to act for injustice.. "

Report Abuse


|||Please refer to aforesaid further question %26amp; even more later on. Please make your language not to prejudiced ethnic, and do not be proud your official language is the English, and you might not be able to write %26amp; speak any another language at all, English only. OK!!!

Report Abuse


|||yeah theres no hidden terrorist message THERE!

No comments:

Post a Comment